How to Use P-Value to Test the Significance of Your Results

How to Use P-Value to Test the Significance of Your Results: A Complete Guide with Examples

In statistics and research, we widely utilize the concept of P-value: a measure indicating the likelihood that your data might have materialized by chance if indeed, the null hypothesis held true. The null hypothesis posits an assumed absence—no effect or relationship specifically here—between studied variables; it serves as our working baseline throughout our analysis.

{tocify} $title={Table of Contents}

What is P-Value and What Does It Tell You?

The p-value, a numerical indicator between 0 and 1, communicates the likelihood of your data arising by chance under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value suggests that your data is less likely attributable to random chance; consequently, this provides stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
Suppose you aim to determine the fairness or bias of a coin. Upon conducting a test by tossing it ten times, you observe nine heads and one tail. The null hypothesis posits that the coin is inherently fair; in other words, each flip should yield an equal chance for either heads or tails with a probability of 0.5. The alternative hypothesis posits a biased coin, suggesting the probability of obtaining either a head or tail does not stand at 0.5.

Calculating the p-value entails finding the probability of obtaining results as extreme or more (such as 10 heads and 0 tails) when tossing a fair coin, thus necessitating you to use: Binomial Distribution. This model represents—through an unchanging success probability—a fixed number of trials' successes; specifically it quantifies how many times a specific outcome occurs in independent and identical trials.

Utilizing a calculator or software, one can ascertain the p-value as 0.021: an indication that--should the coin be indeed fair--only a minute chance of obtaining results more extreme than nine heads and one tail exists; specifically, this translates to merely 2.1%. Given such an inherently low probability – here we introduce graduate-level punctuation in the form of colons and semi-colons – strong evidence emerges to reject your null hypothesis: you may confidently conclude that bias skews this particular coin's outcomes.

How to Use P-Value in Hypothesis Testing and Decision Making?

In hypothesis testing, we often utilize the P-value; this is a process of deriving statistical inferences about a population from its sample. The steps involved in hypothesis testing are as follows:

Define Null and Alternative Hypothesis:

The null hypothesis: the default assumption posits no effect or relationship between the variables; its opposite--the alternative hypothesis--asserts an effect, or relationship exists between these same variables.

Choose a significance level (alpha):

Select a significance level--commonly set at 0.05, 0.01 or even lower to an extreme of 0.001--which represents the maximum probability of committing type I error: that is, incorrectly rejecting your null hypothesis when it remains true. The choice for this critical value hinges on two factors—one being field-specific guidelines and the other contextual elements within your research environment; thus ensuring precision in statistical inference tailored precisely to fit each unique case presented across various disciplines and contexts.

Gather the data; subsequently, compute the test statistic: 

This numerical value condenses and gauges the evidence's potency against the null hypothesis. Distinct types of tests employ varied statistics--for instance, there is a t-test, z-test or chi-square test among others.

Compute the p-value: 

This represents the likelihood of obtaining a test statistic--or values more extreme than it--assuming that the null hypothesis holds true. Formulas, tables or software can all be utilized to calculate this essential metric; each method offers its own unique advantages and conveniences in particular situations.

Compare the p-value to the significance level, then decide: 

If the p-value equals or falls below your chosen alpha - a measure of statistical significance; you must reject your null hypothesis and embrace an alternative. This implies – with compelling evidence in support– that you have substantiated a claim successfully. Should the significance level exceed the p-value, you would not reject the null hypothesis nor accept its alternative. Hence, insufficient evidence exists to substantiate your claim.

How to Calculate P-Value Using R?

The widely used R is an open-source programming language, primarily for data analysis and visualization. Numerous built-in functions and packages within it facilitate the effortless calculation of p-values for diverse test types.

We will illustrate the use of R in calculating p-values using a sample dataset: mtcars. This data set--comprising information about 32 cars, including miles per gallon (mpg); number of cylinders (cyl); horsepower (hp), and weight (wt)--can be loaded into your R console by typing "data(mtcars)."

Suppose you desire to evaluate the potential difference in average mpg between cars equipped with 4 cylinders and those possessing 6. In this scenario, a two-sample t-test is applicable for comparing the means of these distinct groups. The null hypothesis posits equality in means, while its alternative counterpart suggests inequality among them.

You may utilize the t.test() function to execute a t-test and obtain the p-value; this particular function requires two vectors as arguments, subsequently returning a list of results. For instance--should you wish to compare car mpg between those with four cylinders and those possessing six:

t.test(mtcars$mpg[mtcars$cyl == 4], mtcars$mpg[mtcars$cyl == 6])

The output is:

Welch Two Sample t-test

data:  mtcars$mpg[mtcars$cyl == 4] and mtcars$mpg[mtcars$cyl == 6]
t = 4.7191, df = 13.073, p-value = 0.0004049
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
  4.177551 10.650449
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y 
 26.66364  19.74286 

The p-value is 0.0004049, which is much smaller than the significance level of 0.05. This means that you can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the average mpg of cars with 4 and 6 cylinders.
How to Report P-Value in Your Research Papers or Reports?
With a p-value of 0.0004049 significantly smaller than the predetermined significance level of 0.05, one can confidently reject the null hypothesis; this infers an evident distinction in average mpg between cars equipped with 4 and those furnished with 6 cylinders.

How to Report P-Value in Your Research Papers or Reports?

In your research papers or reports, adhere to these general guidelines for reporting p-values:

• Utilize the precise p-value instead of employing an arbitrary cutoff. Express your findings with accuracy; for instance, replace the generic statement "p < 0.05" with a more specific value such as "p = 0.032".

• Preferably, employ a consistent number of decimal places--ideally two or three: for instance, instead of presenting "p = 0.0004049", rephrase it as "p = 0.0004".

• Indicate the significance level using asterisk () notation: for instance, employ one asterisk when p < 0.05; two asterisks if p is less than 0.01--and three, should it fall below 0.001. As an example—instead of stating “p = 0.0004”—convey this information as "p < 0.001**".

• Please report the test statistic and degrees of freedom, along with the associated p-value. Instead of using an expression like "p < 0.001***", provide a statement in this format: 't(13.073) = 4.7191, p < 0.001***'.

• Please report the effect size, along with its confidence interval and p-value. The magnitude of the difference or relationship between variables characterizes the effect size. A range of values - known as a confidence interval - holds within it, with a certain probability, the true population parameter. Instead of the phrase "t(13.073) = 4.7191, p < 0.001***" consider using a more comprehensive statement such as: "t(13.073) = 4.7191, p < 0.001***, Cohen’s d = 1.76; with a confidence interval of ninety-five percent and an estimated range from four point one eight to ten point six five. 95% CI[4.18, 10.65]".

What Are Some Common Misconceptions and Limitations of P-Value?

Statistics and research employ the P-value concept extensively due to its utility; however, it frequently encounters misunderstanding and misuse. Therefore - understanding these common misconceptions, as well as limitations associated with P-values: this is imperative for you.

• The P-value does not represent the truth or falsity of the null hypothesis: rather, it signifies the probability of obtaining data—either equivalent or more extreme to that observed—if we assume the null hypothesis is valid. However; it remains neutral on confirming or refuting said null hypothesis.

• The P-value does not represent the likelihood of your results being attributable to chance or otherwise; rather, it signifies the probability of obtaining these findings - or more extreme ones - under an assumption that chance alone is responsible for them. However, this metric remains silent on whether indeed your results stem from random occurrences.

• The significance level (alpha) and the p-value are not synonymous: indeed, they serve distinct purposes in statistical hypothesis testing. The former represents maximum probability of committing a type I error--that is, erroneously rejecting the null hypothesis when it holds true; on the other hand, we define p-value as an actual likelihood for such an error to occur based on our data-set. To make a decision about the null hypothesis, compare the p-value with the significance level.

• The effect size, a gauge of the magnitude in difference or relationship between variables, differs from the p-value: indeed, these two are not identical. The strength of evidence against the null hypothesis is precisely what we measure with a p-value. The sample size, data variability, and significance level all influence the p-value; however, they do not affect the effect size. To present a comprehensive result picture: reporting both the p-value and confidence interval alongside the effect size is crucial.

• The P-value neither definitively proves nor disproves your hypothesis; it merely measures the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. This measure, however, does not guarantee truth or falsehood of the null hypothesis. Other factors - including measurement errors, confounding variables and sampling bias among others - may influence results profoundly. One should interpret the P-value cautiously, considering factors such as: the research question; data quality and prior knowledge.